Qwen3.8 27B on AMD Strix Halo
Qwen3.8 27B runs locally on AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 / Radeon 8060S Strix Halo systems. The useful question is no longer only “does it run?” It is which official, stock, MTP, DFlash, ROCmFP4, or performance-fork route fits the workload—and which published numbers are actually comparable.
Evidence reviewed: August 30, 2026.
Project home: Strix Halo Guide. The canonical Qwen3.8 evidence page is on the project domain; this page remains a technical mirror.
Fast Answer
| Question | Current answer |
|---|---|
| Easiest measured official route | qwen3.8:27b through Ollama 0.32.13 and Vulkan/RADV |
| Guide-measured warm result | 292.49 prompt t/s and 20.42 generation t/s over nine repeats |
| Guide-measured capabilities | Image, tool-call, thinking, and exact retrieval through 50,059 prompt tokens passed |
| Long-context boundary | A 56,051-token attempt caused a recoverable device loss on that exact stack; separate corrected GMKtec evidence reached 261,130 evaluated tokens |
| 52-65 t/s posts | Advanced fork/quant/speculation leads that require their exact artifacts, prompts, context behavior, and independent reproduction |
For commands, the complete matrix, caveats, upstream alerts, and raw evidence, read the canonical Qwen3.8 Strix Halo decision page.
Start With Ollama
The measured official route used the 17.7GB-decimal Q4_K_M artifact:
ollama run qwen3.8:27b
The Strix Halo service still needs the guide’s Vulkan/iGPU environment,
including OLLAMA_VULKAN=1 and OLLAMA_IGPU_ENABLE=1. Ollama 0.33.2 is the
current checked package, but it has not inherited the measured 0.32.13 result
or the full normal-service/reboot qualification.
Why The Speed Claims Differ
Official Ollama, stock llama.cpp, custom quants, ROCmFP4, native MTP,
DFlash2, and adaptive speculation are different routes. Code versus prose,
cold versus cached context, context depth, generated-token count, and draft
acceptance can change the result again. A useful comparison therefore records
the entire profile, not only a tokens-per-second screenshot.
The guide keeps:
- first-party raw Ollama evidence,
- community/runtime provenance, and
- the machine-readable route matrix
separate so readers can decide which result applies to them.
What Should Be Tested Next?
The missing proof is a matched same-host ladder: stock b10687 Vulkan without speculation, native MTP, corrected HIP correctness, a published ROCmFP4 route, and a fully published DFlash/adaptive route. It must cover code and prose, 4K/16K/50K context, exact outputs, vision/tools, acceptance, memory, hashes, and raw logs.
See the live test queue or submit a benchmark report.
Independence And Affiliate Disclosure
This guide contains no affiliate links as of August 30, 2026. Future affiliate, loaned, gifted, sponsored, or early-access relationships must be disclosed near the relevant links/results and do not buy positive conclusions. Community results remain separate from first-party measurements. The public affiliate link registry remains the audit source if that status changes.